IG

The Design Exit: Don’t Look Behind!

Hesitations of a Field in Turn and Turmoil

The introduction below is an excerpt from a published chapter in an edited volume titled: Unununimimimdededesign – The Hesitant State of Design edited by Joannette van der Veer and published by Onomatopee in 2022.

The Design Exit is a project that negotiates repositioning design outside of the art-school system (within a European-context), and discusses the overdue critical turn in design education as a form of alter-reality.

A critical turn took place in the early 1970s among scholars in the humanities and social sciences to make cultures, criticality, decoloniality and plural relations the foci of contemporary debates; whilst also demonstrating a shift in emphasis toward meaning, and away from a positivist epistemology(1). Design is only 50 years late to this debate. The field is in need of a shift into a new era outside of the art academy, away from solutionism and design-positivism(2).

The Design Exit was launched as a series of digital round-tables for the months of September, October, and November 2020 hosted by Imad Gebrayel with guest participants: Ahmed Ansari, Chris Lee, Eva Gonçalves, Maya Ober, Nadine Rotem, Nina Paim, Sara Kaaman, Sérgio Miguel Magalhães and Zoy Anastassakis. The aim was to start an active, open-ended debate about design, design education and disciplinary boundaries.

This essay threads auto-ethnographic passages with excerpts from the series, where fragmentation and messiness become intentional carriers of open-ended questions and reflections. Contrary to popular belief, this essay does not provide solutions. I hereby share provocative hesitations and self-reflexive thoughts on my own positionality in liminal(3) spaces between design academia and anthropology. While complicit in disseminating (and resisting) colonial academic structures through teaching and studying in colonial institutions, I believe in using my (precarious) position to entice counter-disciplinary thinking, self-critical knowledge production and unions. I believe in unions. […]

Purchase link via: https://www.onomatopee.net/product/unununimimimdededesign/

Students can contact me directly for the text: imadgebrayel@gmail.com

2022

Published on:

August 30, 2024

#Anthropology, #Design, #Design Education, #Ethnography, #Migration

Gebrael, I. (2022). The Design Exit: Don’t Look Behind. In J. Van Der Veer (Ed.), Unununimimimdededesign. Onomatopee.

ISBN978-94-93148-89-5

The Design Exit: Don’t Look Behind!

2022

Published on:

#Anthropology, #Design, #Design Education, #Ethnography, #Migration

Gebrael, I. (2022). The Design Exit: Don’t Look Behind. In J. Van Der Veer (Ed.), Unununimimimdededesign. Onomatopee.

ISBN978-94-93148-89-5

Hesitations of a Field in Turn and Turmoil

The introduction below is an excerpt from a published chapter in an edited volume titled: Unununimimimdededesign – The Hesitant State of Design edited by Joannette van der Veer and published by Onomatopee in 2022.

The Design Exit is a project that negotiates repositioning design outside of the art-school system (within a European-context), and discusses the overdue critical turn in design education as a form of alter-reality.

A critical turn took place in the early 1970s among scholars in the humanities and social sciences to make cultures, criticality, decoloniality and plural relations the foci of contemporary debates; whilst also demonstrating a shift in emphasis toward meaning, and away from a positivist epistemology(1). Design is only 50 years late to this debate. The field is in need of a shift into a new era outside of the art academy, away from solutionism and design-positivism(2).

The Design Exit was launched as a series of digital round-tables for the months of September, October, and November 2020 hosted by Imad Gebrayel with guest participants: Ahmed Ansari, Chris Lee, Eva Gonçalves, Maya Ober, Nadine Rotem, Nina Paim, Sara Kaaman, Sérgio Miguel Magalhães and Zoy Anastassakis. The aim was to start an active, open-ended debate about design, design education and disciplinary boundaries.

This essay threads auto-ethnographic passages with excerpts from the series, where fragmentation and messiness become intentional carriers of open-ended questions and reflections. Contrary to popular belief, this essay does not provide solutions. I hereby share provocative hesitations and self-reflexive thoughts on my own positionality in liminal(3) spaces between design academia and anthropology. While complicit in disseminating (and resisting) colonial academic structures through teaching and studying in colonial institutions, I believe in using my (precarious) position to entice counter-disciplinary thinking, self-critical knowledge production and unions. I believe in unions. […]

Purchase link via: https://www.onomatopee.net/product/unununimimimdededesign/

Students can contact me directly for the text: imadgebrayel@gmail.com